Salama,, A., Owon, M., EI-Kady, S., El-Kousy, H., El-Sharkawy, A. (2006). EFFECT OF SOME GROWTH PROMOTERS ADDED TO RATIONS OF FRIESIAN CALVES ON QUALITIES AND COOKWMBPROPERTES(M=MEAP 1. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF RAW Longissimus dorsi MUSCLE MEAT.. Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences, 31(11), 7215-7229. doi: 10.21608/jfds.2006.236884
A. A. Salama,; M. A. Owon; S. A. EI-Kady; H. A. El-Kousy; A. M. El-Sharkawy. "EFFECT OF SOME GROWTH PROMOTERS ADDED TO RATIONS OF FRIESIAN CALVES ON QUALITIES AND COOKWMBPROPERTES(M=MEAP 1. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF RAW Longissimus dorsi MUSCLE MEAT.". Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences, 31, 11, 2006, 7215-7229. doi: 10.21608/jfds.2006.236884
Salama,, A., Owon, M., EI-Kady, S., El-Kousy, H., El-Sharkawy, A. (2006). 'EFFECT OF SOME GROWTH PROMOTERS ADDED TO RATIONS OF FRIESIAN CALVES ON QUALITIES AND COOKWMBPROPERTES(M=MEAP 1. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF RAW Longissimus dorsi MUSCLE MEAT.', Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences, 31(11), pp. 7215-7229. doi: 10.21608/jfds.2006.236884
Salama,, A., Owon, M., EI-Kady, S., El-Kousy, H., El-Sharkawy, A. EFFECT OF SOME GROWTH PROMOTERS ADDED TO RATIONS OF FRIESIAN CALVES ON QUALITIES AND COOKWMBPROPERTES(M=MEAP 1. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF RAW Longissimus dorsi MUSCLE MEAT.. Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences, 2006; 31(11): 7215-7229. doi: 10.21608/jfds.2006.236884
EFFECT OF SOME GROWTH PROMOTERS ADDED TO RATIONS OF FRIESIAN CALVES ON QUALITIES AND COOKWMBPROPERTES(M=MEAP 1. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF RAW Longissimus dorsi MUSCLE MEAT.
This investigation was aimed to study the effect of some commercials growth
prometers (fibrozyime, moreyeast and pronifer) added to rations of Friesian calves on
physical characteristics and chemical composition of raw longissmus dorsi (LD)
muscle meat post-mortem.
The longissimus dorsi muscle area for control grow recorded the lowest value.
while it was increased in treated groups. High tenderness of meat (moreyeast group)
was explained by high fat contents and conversion of part of tough connective
dissues into fatty tissues. It could be noticed that water holding capacity (WHC) was
higher in moreyeat group, followed by pronifer and control group, while the lowest
value was recorded at fibrozyme group.
The average of crude protein content of meat was slightly higher for calves
supplemented groups than that in control group. The highest value was recorded in
pronifer group (84.14%). while the lowest value was recorded in control (81.29%).
The effect of different growth promoters on the ether extract and ash contents of meat
were not pronounced. In general no significant differences between treatments for
nitrogenous compounds and pH values, also no significant differences between
treatments and control.
All of calve's meat fed on control ration and supplemented groups with growth
promoters recorded high concentration for potassium, followed by phosphorus,
sodium, calcium, magnesium, iron and zinc, while the lowest amounts were recorded
for cadmium, followed by manganese, copper and lead.
The most abundant amino acid, glutamic acid, was averaged between 18.47
and 19.56 g/16 N and followed by aspartlc acid. then arginine, lysine, leucine,
alanine, valine, glycine, threonine, isoleucine. phenylalanine, serine, tyrosine, proline
and histidine. The sulfur containing amino acids (methionine and cystlne) and
tryptophan were relatively very low in all samples comparing with the other
indispensable amino acids.
The computed protein efficiency ratio (C-PER) of meat protein for control
ration and supplemented groups with growth promoters (fibrozyme moreyeast and
pronifer) was 1.25, 2.62, 2.22 and 2.35, respectively. The high value of C-PER and
biological Value (BV) were in fibrozyme. treatment, followed by pronifer, then
moreyeast, while it was very low in control group .
The results showed higher percentage of total unsaturated fatty acids (USFA)
in calves meat supplemented with fibrozyme, moreyeast and pronifer than control
group. The dominant USFA was C13 :1 followed by C1812. while the dominant saturated
fatty acids was C160 and 018:0- The ratio of short chain fatty acids observed were
lower than the long chain fatty acids in all samples. Growth promoters led to increase
USFA, especially (Linoleic we and Iinolenic (03 acids) and reduced the saturated fatty
acids.