• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 16 (2025)
Volume Volume 15 (2024)
Volume Volume 14 (2023)
Volume Volume 13 (2022)
Volume Volume 12 (2021)
Volume Volume 11 (2020)
Volume Volume 10 (2019)
Volume Volume 9 (2018)
Volume Volume 03 (2018)
Volume Volume 8 (2017)
Volume Volume 7 (2016)
Volume Volume 6 (2015)
Volume Volume 5 (2014)
Volume Volume 4 (2013)
Volume Volume 3 (2012)
Volume Volume 2 (2011)
Volume Volume 1 (2010)
Volume Volume 34 (2009)
Volume Volume 33 (2008)
Volume Volume 32 (2007)
Volume Volume 31 (2006)
Volume Volume 30 (2005)
Volume Volume 29 (2004)
Volume Volume 28 (2003)
Volume Volume 27 (2002)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 26 (2001)
Volume Volume 25 (2000)
Nassib,, T., Taleb, A., Naiem, M. (2002). EVALUATION OF METHODS USED FOR DETECTION OF FORMALIN IN MILK. Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences, 27(7), 4771-4778. doi: 10.21608/jfds.2002.255917
T. A. Nassib,; A. M. Taleb; Manal A. Naiem. "EVALUATION OF METHODS USED FOR DETECTION OF FORMALIN IN MILK". Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences, 27, 7, 2002, 4771-4778. doi: 10.21608/jfds.2002.255917
Nassib,, T., Taleb, A., Naiem, M. (2002). 'EVALUATION OF METHODS USED FOR DETECTION OF FORMALIN IN MILK', Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences, 27(7), pp. 4771-4778. doi: 10.21608/jfds.2002.255917
Nassib,, T., Taleb, A., Naiem, M. EVALUATION OF METHODS USED FOR DETECTION OF FORMALIN IN MILK. Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences, 2002; 27(7): 4771-4778. doi: 10.21608/jfds.2002.255917

EVALUATION OF METHODS USED FOR DETECTION OF FORMALIN IN MILK

Article 2, Volume 27, Issue 7, July 2002, Page 4771-4778  XML PDF (932.58 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jfds.2002.255917
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
T. A. Nassib,1; A. M. Taleb2; Manal A. Naiem2
1Dairy Science Department, Fac. of Agrlc. Mansoura Univ, Egypt.
2Dairy Chemistry Laboratory, Anlm. Prod. Res. Inst., Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt.
Abstract
Seven colorimetric methods were conducted to detect formalin in either in
water solutions, or in milk containing different concentration of formalin (1-1000 ppm).
The methods used were : Hehner's test (1) ; Leech's test (2) ; Shrewsbury and
Knapp's test (3) ; Nash's reagent (4); Chromotropic acid method (5) ; Schryver's test
(6) and phenythydrazin potassium ferrocyanid test (7). It was noticed that methods (4)
and (5) were more sensitive than others for detecting formalin in water solutions,
whereas the most sensitive methods to detect formalin in milk samples were (2), (4)
and (5). On the other hand, with water-base solution, methods (1), (2) and (3) failed to
detect either low or high formalin concentrations, while methods (6) and (7) failed only
to detect the lower concentrations. The same trend was obtained with milk samples
except method (2) which was sensitive for all concentrations. Methods (4) and (5) were selected to detecte the prasence of formalin presence in the whey of acid coagulation cow's milk (with sulphuric or acetic acid), and in the distilate obtained by indirect distilation of milk samples. The results obtained by using method (4) were always less than the actual polluted concentrations and represent - 58-62% In the case of acid whey and 37-52% in the indirect distilation method. Examination of the presence of formalin in acid whey by using method (5) to detect it, however, more accurate results were obtained by using indirect distilation method compared with method (4) (53-70% VS. 37-52%, respectively.).
Statistics
Article View: 257
PDF Download: 318
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.